|
|
|
|
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Figures
Tables
Conclusion
References
|
|
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has become a standard clinical
procedure in assessing the health of white matter in the
brain. Tractography, the tracing of individual fibers in the
brain using DTI data, has begun to play a more central role
in neuroscience research, particularly in understanding the
relationships between brain connectivity and behavior. The
measuring of features related to bundles of fibers, i.e., tracts
or fasciculi, is currently problematic because of the need for
manual interaction. This article presents an algorithm for the
automatic identification of selected white matter tracts. It extracts
fibers using the FACT algorithm and finds cortical gyral
labels using a multi-atlas deformable registration scheme.
Tracts are identified as the fibers passing between selected
cortical labels. The quality of automatic labels are compared
both visually and numerically against a well-accepted manual
approach. The automatic approach is shown to be more
consistent with conventional definitions of tracts and more repeatable
on separate scans of the same subject.
|
|
| |
An illustration of the major white matter tracts.
|
|
Introduction
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) [1] is a recently developed
imaging modality that provides insight into the direction of
diffusion in tissue. By obtaining at least 6 diffusion-weighted
images [2], a tensor that describes this diffusion can be computed.
At each voxel, the direction of strongest diffusion is
indicated by the principal eigenvector of the tensor. In cortical
white matter (WM), it indicates the direction of parallel
groups of myelinated axons, or fibers, which give rise to
a high fractional anisotropy (FA) [3]. Fiber tracking algorithms
[4, 5] have successfully been used to reconstruct white
matter fibers in the human brain.
Methods
Acquisition
Scans for three subjects (2 Male, 1 Female, all right handed
aged 23, 28 and 31) were obtained using a 3.0T Philips
(Philips Medical Systems, Netherlands) Intera scanner. A
single-shot EPI protocol with sensitivity encoding (SENSE)
was used to obtain four separate 30 direction DTI acquisitions
for each subject. The resulting images were 256x256x65 with
a resolution of 0.828125x0.828125x2.2 mms. Additionally
an MP-RAGE image was also obtained for each subject. The
MP-RAGE was 256x256x130 with 0.828125x0.828125x1.1
mms resolution. All data was converted to have an isotropic
voxel of length 0.828125mms, the resultant datasets were
256x256x173 in voxel dimension.
|
| |
Geometry Correction
Echo Planar imaging (EPI) is a fast imaging sequence that
is typically used in DTI in order to keep scan times as low
as possible. EPI acquisitions suffer from geometric distortion
due to susceptibility changes in the field of view (FOV). Since
a structural MRI better represents a subject`s anatomy, we use
it as our reference space. We accomplish this by registering
the diffusion-weighted data to the structural acquisition. See Fig. 2
for an example. |
Figure 2
(a) Distorted DWI acquisition
(b) Its outline on the MPRAGE
(c) Geometry-corrected DWI
(d) Its outline
|
|
Results
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) [1] is a recently developed
imaging modality that provides insight into the direction of
diffusion in tissue. By obtaining at least 6 diffusion-weighted
images [2], a tensor that describes this diffusion can be computed.
At each voxel, the direction of strongest diffusion is
indicated by the principal eigenvector of the tensor. In cortical
white matter (WM), it indicates the direction of parallel
groups of myelinated axons, or fibers, which give rise to
a high fractional anisotropy (FA) [3]. Fiber tracking algorithms
[4, 5] have successfully been used to reconstruct white
matter fibers in the human brain.
|
| |
|
|
 |
 |
| (a) |
(b) |
 |
 |
| (c) |
(d) |
Fig. 1 Comparison of the left uncinate fasciculus obtained (a)-(b) manually, and (c)-(d) automatically,
with a transparent cortical surface
|
| |
 |
 |
| (a) |
(b) |
 |
 |
| (c) |
(d) |
Fig. 2 Comparison of the left forceps-major obtained (a)-(b) manually, and (c)-(d) automatically,
with a transparent cortical surface
|
| |
| Right | Left |
| CN | LO | LI | CN | LO | LI | FF |
| Right | CN | - | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| LO | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 0 |
| LI | 0 | 0 | - | 222 | 0 | 234 | 106 |
| Left | CN | 186 | 0 | 234 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LO | 13 | 0 | 130 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
| LI | 59 | 0 | 354 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 |
| FF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
|
Table 1 An example of anatomically incorrect gyral connectivity
for a manually obtained (gray) F-MAJ and an anatomically
correct and fuller result from the automatically obtained
F-MAJ: Fiber counts for one data set are shown. CN: Cuneus,
LO: Lateral Occipital, LI: Lingual and FF: Fusiform. |
| |
Suppose VM is the set of voxels containing manually generated fibers,
and VA are those voxels containing automatically generated
fibers. Then
is the containment index (CI)
of the volume of the manual tracts in the volume of the automatic
tracts, the results of which are shown in Table 2. CI is
a measure of how much of the manual tracts are recoverable
with our automated approach. |
| |
| Subject | F-Maj | F-Min | UNC-R | UNC-L |
| 1 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.48 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.54 |
|
Table 2 Containment Index of manual tract in automatic tract for 4 major tracts over fiber volume for each
subject averaged over the four DTI scans..
|
| |
|
Conclusion
With this preliminary work on automated fasciculus identification
we have shown that there are distinct flaws with using
human raters for this task. While our approach is not yet
perfect, it shows considerable promise. Our algorithm is currently
limited by the resolution of the labeling scheme, which
is why we currently recover more tracts then the anatomist
expert. In future work, we will apply this method to more
major fiber tracts and augment this new work with subcortical
labels. We expect this will improve the quality of resulting
tracts and facilitate the identification of different fasciculi.
|
|
References
[1] P. J. Basser et. al., "MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and
imaging," Biophys J., vol. 66, pp. 259-267, 1994.
[2] D. K. Jones, M. A. Horsfield, and A. Simmons, "Optimal
strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by
magnetic resonance imaging," Mag. Res. Med., vol. 42, pp.
515-525, 1999.
[3] P. J. Basser and C. Pierpaoli, "Microstructural and physiological
features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusiontensor
MRI," JMR B, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 209-219, 1996.
[4] S. Mori et. al., "Three dimensional tracking of axonal projections
in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging," Annal.
Neurol., vol. 45, pp. 265-269, 1999.
[5] T. E. Conturo et. al., "Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in
the living human brain," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 96, pp.
10422-10427, 1999.
[6] O. Ciccarelli et. al., "From diffusion tractography to quantitative
white matter tract measures: a reproducibility study,"
NeuroImage, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 348-359, 2003.
[7] S. K. Lee et. al., "Diffusion-tensor mr imaging and fiber tractography:
A new method of describing aberrant fiber connections
in developmental CNS anomalies," Radiographics, vol.
25, no. 1, pp. 53-65, 2005.
[8] A. Sherbondy et. al., "Exploring connectivity of the brain's
white matter with dynamic queries," IEEE Trans. on Visualization
and Comp. Graphics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 419-430, 2005.
[9] H. Huang et. al., "Cortico-cortical connectivity revealed by
DTI-based tractography," in Proc. Int'l Soc. Mag. Res. Med.,
May 2006.
[10] S.Wakana et. al., "Reproducibility of quantitative tractography
methods applied to cerebral white matter," NeuroImage, vol.
36, no. 3, pp. 630-644, 2007.
[11] G. K. Rohde, A. Aldroubi, and B. M. Dawant, "The adaptive
bases algorithm for intensity based nonrigid image registration,"
IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 22, pp. 1470-1479,
2003.
[12] R. S. Desikan et. al., "An automated labeling system for subdividing
the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral
based regions of interest," NeuroImage, vol. 31, no. 3, pp.
968-980, 2006.
[13] R. A. Bergman and A. K. Afifi, Functional neuroanatomy: text
and atlas, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005.
|
|